Here is a
funny exercise. Type the words "KPI Dashboard" in Google Pictures and look at the first 20
results. I bet there are at least 15 dashboards shown like the one shown here (from ontimec.com).
This is the way many consultant firms wants us to think of KPIs. Tidy and
comprehensive dashboards, complete with meters, stopping lights, pictures and
what have you. Most of them are “real time” and promise to drive your business
to the sky and above.
Frequency rate
Some
suppliers of KPI Dashboards promote their Real Time Functionality. I assume not
because it is particularly useful, but because it sounds nice in sales-pitches.
I don’t question whether the supplier can actually deliver this functionality,
but most often the data needed for such a dashboard is not available in real
time. And increasing the frequency by which your KPI Dashboard is presented
comes with a price. There is a converse relation between the frequency and the
number of KPIs you can present. If done
right the number of KPI’s on your dashboard should decrease as soon as you
increase its frequency.
Consider a call center where you might want to show
some KPIs on a big screen (e.g. the number of customers waiting and the time
they are waiting). Of course these KPIs should be presented in real time. But
what happens when you start increasing the number of indicators on the screen?
Agents probably start being distracted and focused on the screen in stead of
the call they are having (whether it is wise to put KPIs in a call center in the
first place is another discussion we will have in another blog).
So finding the
right balance between Frequency and Number of KPIs is key. One can imagine that
an insurance company that has a 50 page thick KPI document that is discussed
each month by Senior Management isn’t deploying their KPIS very effectively. By
the time the document is created, agreed upon, distributed and ready for
discussion, it is time to start with the next months report. One thing is most
important here. Don’t just copy the frequency rate just because it was always done so. Or because some department within
the organisation requires it to be so (“our
report is sent to Senior Management each quarter so could you please aggregate
your daily KPI into a quarterly dashboard?”)
Creation and Distribution
Every KPI
should have a (documented) Initially Intended Purpose (IIP) set by the KPI
Owner (hopefully you a have one). Of course this Owner can “outsource” the
creation and distribution of the KPI to someone else. In that case a mutual agreement
should exist between these two parties. If not changes are that the KPI will at
some time change and deviate from the IIP. Often the KPI Owner and the KPI User
are one an the same person (or department). But there might be other Users too
(Senior Management, Compliance, Risk, Finance, Audit, etc). Again these “second
hand” Users should take notice of the IIP, otherwise KPIs will be used out of
context, leading to wrong conclusions and actions. Especially when Owner,
Provider, and User are all different people or departments.
Actionability
A KPI is
more than just an indicator. As said in the previous blog a KPI should at least
influence future behaviour if appropriate. As a result it is important that before
implementing the KPI one should think in what way actions can be extracted from
the KPIs and how the follow up is organised. Is there a Issue Management
process in place, by which actions can be defined, allocated, solved and
monitored? Are roles and responsibilities documented? Do the people involved
aware of what is expected from them?
Let’s say
that you have implemented a KPI that measures the effect of a marketing
campaign of some sort (e.g. number of customers per week that used the
promo-code online). What corrective
actions should be planned upfront in case the indicator shows
“underperformance”. Is a new mailing
ready for distribution? And do we already know who to mail and how many? Will
the business case still be valid and who will make this decision? Again, all
these questions should be addressed and planned upfront.
Tools
The tool
most used to create KPIs is probably Excel, later to be copied into nice PowerPoint
slides with colorful graphs and matrixes. But using MS Office as your
deployment toolkit is time-consuming and maintenance is difficult (we all know
how we miss our Key Excel Guru as soon as he is on unexpected sick leave).
There are
many suppliers of Dashboards in the market that developed “of the shelf”
applications sometimes even providing you with a set of KPIs “ready to use”.
These applications are often developed specifically for certain industries or
topics (Risk, Data Quality, Finance, Customer Satisfaction etc). Downside of
these tools is that the work best (or only) if you use the KPIs provided by the
supplier. And most often you have to provide a very specific set of data in
order to implement them properly. But even if you would be able to do so, the
question is whether these “of the shelf” KPIs are best measuring your specific
goals. Remember all the previous blogs where we described the four steps. All
things considered you might say that each KPI is in the end very customized for
a specific goal. It would be impossible for a pre-set KPI to meet all the
requirements, regardless what the supplier claims.
Next time I
will summarize the past 6 blogs (the five steps). And after that I will address
the five most overrated KPIs.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten